Knowing how a particular decision will be made can also help a team or the organization plan their meeting agendas more effectively and lead to a more collaborative team process.
There are a number of possible models for decision making ranging from least participatory to more democratic or decision making by consensus. Stein (2007) summarized these various models:
- Team leader decides and informs the team. This model may be appropriate for time-sensitive decisions or for decisions where the team is likely to support and implement the decision regardless of whether or not they have given inputs.
- Team leader gathers input from team then decides. This model may be helpful where expert opinion or input is needed from the team to make the best decision. The synergy of team discussion may lead to a richer decision but the team itself does not need to come to an agreement about the particular course of action.
- Consensus decisions. Consensus decisions include input from and acceptance by each member of the team. Consensus decisions have a very high level of team involvement and can lead to strong, and well supported decisions.
- Consensus with a fallback. This decision making model presets a course of action to be taken if the team is unable to make a decision within an appropriate amount of time. Of course, the time allocated for a particular decision will depend on the decision’s complexity, importance and the difficulty of implementation. The preferred fallback may be to the team leader, who considers the team’s inputs and then decides.
- Team leader sets constraints and delegates decisions to team members. Once team members know about any critical constraints, the team leader can delegate a decision to the team or a subgroup of the team. This decision-making model helps teams share the responsibility for decisions, can help the team and individual members develop decision-making skills, and allows the team leader to use his/her time in another way.
- A popular method is the use of “majority rules.” Majority vote can be an effective decision-making model for low-impact decisions but less effective in value-laden decisions.